What a CMMC POA&M is
32 CFR 170.4 defines a Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) as "a document that identifies tasks needing to be accomplished". It also records the resources required, the milestones, and the scheduled completion dates. In practice it is a per-requirement action plan. For each NOT MET requirement it records:
- the gap
- the role that owns the fix
- the remediation approach
- the evidence that will prove closure
- the completion date
Three rules shape everything else on this page:
- A POA&M does not turn NOT MET into MET. 32 CFR 170.24 is explicit: a requirement that isn't implemented is scored NOT MET whether or not it is on a POA&M. The deduction stays in your score until the requirement is actually implemented.
- Level 1 never gets a POA&M. 32 CFR 170.21(a)(1) doesn't permit one for a Level 1 self-assessment. All 15 Level 1 requirements must be MET.
- The clock runs from the status date, not the assessment. At Level 2 you have 180 days from the Conditional CMMC Status Date to close every POA&M item through a POA&M closeout assessment and reach Final status (32 CFR 170.21(b)).
What can (and can't) be on a CMMC POA&M: 32 CFR 170.21
Conditional Level 2 status depends on three gates in 32 CFR 170.21(a)(2). Fail any one and the result is no CMMC status, not Conditional status.
Gate 1: minimum score
Your assessment score divided by the total number of Level 2 requirements must be at least 0.8 (170.21(a)(2)(i)). Level 2 is identical to NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, which has 110 requirements (170.14(c)(3)). That makes the floor 88. The score is calculated with the POA&M items still deducted.
Gate 2: point value of 1 only, with one exception
No requirement with a point value above 1 may be on a POA&M (170.21(a)(2)(ii)). That rules out every 3- and 5-point requirement in the CMMC scoring methodology (32 CFR 170.24).
- The exception: SC.L2-3.13.11 (CUI encryption).
- If encryption is employed but is not FIPS-validated, the requirement scores a 3-point deduction and may still go on the POA&M.
- If no encryption is employed, it scores 5 and may not (170.21(a)(2)(ii); 170.24(c)(2)(i)(B)(4)(ii)).
- No exception for MFA. IA.L2-3.5.3 scores 3 points (MFA for remote and privileged users only) or 5 points (none). It is never 1 point, so it can never be on a POA&M (170.24(c)(2)(i)(B)(4)(i)).
Gate 3: six requirements that can never be on a POA&M, even at 1 point
170.21(a)(2)(iii) excludes these outright. They must be MET at assessment:
| CMMC ID | Requirement |
|---|---|
| AC.L2-3.1.20 | External connections |
| AC.L2-3.1.22 | Control publicly posted CUI |
| CA.L2-3.12.4 | System security plan. Without a current SSP the assessment can't be completed at all (170.24(c)(2)(i)(B)(5)). |
| PE.L2-3.10.3 | Escort visitors |
| PE.L2-3.10.4 | Physical access logs |
| PE.L2-3.10.5 | Manage physical access devices |
Can [requirement] be on a POA&M? Quick lookup
All 110 Level 2 requirements, checked against 32 CFR 170.21 and the point values in 32 CFR 170.24. Filter by ID (e.g. "3.3.4"), family (e.g. "AC") or keyword. Under the rule, 46 requirements can be on a POA&M, 1 only under the FIPS exception, and the other 63 cannot.
| CMMC ID | Requirement | Point value (32 CFR 170.24) | Can it be on a CMMC POA&M? | Basis | Evidence guide |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC.L2-3.1.1 | Authorized users/devices | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| AC.L2-3.1.2 | Authorized transactions and functions | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| AC.L2-3.1.3 | Control CUI flow | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.4 | Separation of duties | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.5 | Least privilege | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.6 | Use non-privileged accounts | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.7 | Prevent non-privileged execution of privileged functions | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.8 | Limit unsuccessful logon attempts | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.9 | Privacy and security notices | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.10 | Session lock | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.11 | Automatic session termination | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.12 | Monitor and control remote access sessions | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.13 | Cryptographic protection for remote access | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.14 | Route remote access through managed access control points | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.15 | Authorize remote privileged commands and access | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.16 | Authorize wireless access | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.17 | Protect wireless access | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.18 | Control connection of mobile devices | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.19 | Encrypt CUI on mobile devices | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.20 | Verify and control external connections | 1 | No: prohibited | 170.21(a)(2)(iii) | Evidence guide |
| AC.L2-3.1.21 | Limit use of portable storage on external systems | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AC.L2-3.1.22 | Control publicly accessible CUI | 1 | No: prohibited | 170.21(a)(2)(iii) | — All guides |
| AT.L2-3.2.1 | Security awareness for managers/admins/users | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AT.L2-3.2.2 | Role-based security training | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AT.L2-3.2.3 | Insider threat awareness training | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.1 | Create and retain audit logs | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| AU.L2-3.3.2 | Audit record content | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.3 | Review and update auditable events | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.4 | Alert on audit logging failure | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.5 | Correlate audit review/analysis/reporting | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.6 | Audit reduction and report generation | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.7 | Time synchronization for audit records | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.8 | Protect audit information and tools | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| AU.L2-3.3.9 | Limit audit management to privileged users | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.1 | Baseline configurations and inventories | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| CM.L2-3.4.2 | Enforce security configuration settings | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| CM.L2-3.4.3 | Change control | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.4 | Security impact analysis for changes | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.5 | Access restrictions for changes | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.6 | Least functionality | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.7 | Restrict nonessential programs/services/ports/protocols | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.8 | Allow-by-exception or deny-by-exception software control | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CM.L2-3.4.9 | Control user-installed software | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.1 | Identify users, processes, and devices | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| IA.L2-3.5.2 | Authenticate identities | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| IA.L2-3.5.3 | Multi-factor authentication | 3 or 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| IA.L2-3.5.4 | Replay-resistant authentication | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.5 | Prevent reuse of identifiers | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.6 | Disable identifiers after inactivity | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.7 | Password complexity | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.8 | Password reuse limits | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.9 | Temporary passwords for immediate change | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.10 | Cryptographically protected passwords | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IA.L2-3.5.11 | Obscure authentication feedback | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| IR.L2-3.6.1 | Incident handling capability | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| IR.L2-3.6.2 | Track, document, and report incidents | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| IR.L2-3.6.3 | Test incident response | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MA.L2-3.7.1 | Perform maintenance | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MA.L2-3.7.2 | Control maintenance tools, techniques, personnel | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MA.L2-3.7.3 | Sanitize equipment removed for off-site maintenance | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MA.L2-3.7.4 | Check maintenance media for malicious code | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MA.L2-3.7.5 | MFA for nonlocal maintenance sessions | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MA.L2-3.7.6 | Supervise maintenance personnel without authorization | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.1 | Protect system media | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.2 | Limit access to media | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.3 | Sanitize or destroy media before disposal/reuse | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| MP.L2-3.8.4 | Mark media with CUI markings | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.5 | Protect media during transport | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.6 | Cryptographic protection for digital media in transport | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.7 | Control removable media | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.8 | Prohibit portable storage with no identifiable owner | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| MP.L2-3.8.9 | Protect backup CUI at storage locations | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| PS.L2-3.9.1 | Screen individuals before authorizing access | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| PS.L2-3.9.2 | Protect CUI during personnel actions | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| PE.L2-3.10.1 | Limit physical access to systems/facilities | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| PE.L2-3.10.2 | Protect and monitor physical access | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| PE.L2-3.10.3 | Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity | 1 | No: prohibited | 170.21(a)(2)(iii) | — All guides |
| PE.L2-3.10.4 | Maintain physical access audit logs | 1 | No: prohibited | 170.21(a)(2)(iii) | — All guides |
| PE.L2-3.10.5 | Manage and protect physical access devices | 1 | No: prohibited | 170.21(a)(2)(iii) | — All guides |
| PE.L2-3.10.6 | Protect transmission lines and output devices | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| RA.L2-3.11.1 | Periodic risk assessments | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| RA.L2-3.11.2 | Vulnerability scanning | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| RA.L2-3.11.3 | Remediate vulnerabilities | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CA.L2-3.12.1 | Periodic security assessments | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| CA.L2-3.12.2 | Develop and implement POA&Ms | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| CA.L2-3.12.3 | Continuous monitoring | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| CA.L2-3.12.4 | System Security Plan (SSP) | No point value (assessment can't be completed without it) | No: prohibited | 170.21(a)(2)(iii) | Evidence guide |
| SC.L2-3.13.1 | Boundary protection | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SC.L2-3.13.2 | Secure architecture and engineering principles | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SC.L2-3.13.3 | Separate user and system management functionality | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.4 | Prevent transfer via shared system resources | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.5 | Public system separation/subnetworks | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SC.L2-3.13.6 | Deny network traffic by default; allow by exception | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.7 | Prevent split tunneling | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.8 | Protect CUI in transit | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SC.L2-3.13.9 | Terminate network connections | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.10 | Cryptographic key management | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.11 | FIPS-validated cryptography | 3 or 5 | Only if encryption is employed but not FIPS-validated | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) exception | Evidence guide |
| SC.L2-3.13.12 | Collaborative computing device control | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.13 | Control and monitor mobile code | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.14 | Control and monitor VoIP | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.15 | Protect communications session authenticity | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SC.L2-3.13.16 | Protect CUI at rest | 1 | Yes | 1 point, 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SI.L2-3.14.1 | Identify, report, and correct flaws | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SI.L2-3.14.2 | Malicious code protection | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SI.L2-3.14.3 | Security alerts and advisories | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SI.L2-3.14.4 | Update malicious code protection | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SI.L2-3.14.5 | Perform periodic and real-time scans | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
| SI.L2-3.14.6 | Monitor inbound/outbound traffic and detect attacks | 5 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | Evidence guide |
| SI.L2-3.14.7 | Identify unauthorized system use | 3 | No: point value above 1 | 170.21(a)(2)(ii) | — All guides |
Eligible on paper ≠ safe to defer. Every eligible item still costs its point. Twenty-three open 1-point items take a perfect 110 down to 87, which is below the floor. Plan the POA&M around the score, not just the eligibility column.
Rules as codified in 32 CFR 170.21 and 170.24 (eCFR, current as of 15 October 2026).
The 180-day clock: Conditional status, closeout, and expiry
The clock starts on the Conditional CMMC Status Date, not the assessment date. 32 CFR 170.4 defines the CMMC Status Date as the date the results are submitted to SPRS (Level 2 Self) or to the CMMC instantiation of eMASS (Level 2 C3PAO). When a POA&M closeout succeeds, the Final status keeps the Conditional date. No new date is set.
Who performs the POA&M closeout assessment
| Status sought | Closeout performed by | What is assessed | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final Level 2 (Self) | The OSA, as a POA&M closeout self-assessment, done the same way as the initial self-assessment | Only the NOT MET requirements that were on the POA&M | 170.21(b)(1); 170.4 |
| Final Level 2 (C3PAO) | An authorized or accredited C3PAO | Only the NOT MET requirements that were on the POA&M | 170.21(b)(2); 170.4 |
| Final Level 3 (DIBCAC) | DCMA DIBCAC | Only the NOT MET requirements that were on the POA&M | 170.21(b)(3); 170.4 |
What closeout requires for Level 2 (Self)
- Remediate every NOT MET requirement on the POA&M.
- Perform the POA&M closeout self-assessment.
- Post the compliance results to SPRS within 180 days of the CMMC Status Date (170.16(a)(1)(ii)(B)). The SPRS entry carries POA&M usage and compliance status (170.16(a)(1)(i)).
- Have the Affirming Official submit an affirmation at the completion of the closeout (170.22(a)(3)(iv), (b)(2)).
For Level 2 (C3PAO), the C3PAO posts the closeout results to eMASS within the same 180 days (170.17(a)(1)(ii)(B)). An affirmation follows that closeout too (170.22(b)(3)).
What happens on day 181
The Conditional status expires (170.21(b)). If that happens during a contract's period of performance, two things follow:
- standard contractual remedies apply
- the contractor is ineligible for additional awards requiring that CMMC level for the affected information system until it achieves a new CMMC status
This holds for Level 2 (Self) under 170.16(a)(1)(ii)(B) and for Level 2 (C3PAO) under 170.17(a)(1)(ii)(B).
Working backward from day 180
This is planning guidance, not a rule requirement. Count every milestone from the status date, never from the assessment.
| Day (from status date) | Milestone |
|---|---|
| Day 0 | Results posted to SPRS/eMASS. Record the date on every POA&M line. |
| Day 30 | Each item has an owner role, an approach and a funded resource. |
| Day 60 | Technical changes implemented for most items. |
| Day 120 | Every item implemented. The SSP is updated to match. |
| Day 150 | Internal dry-run closeout: test each item as the closeout will. |
| Day 150–170 | Fix whatever the dry run found. Re-test. |
| Before Day 180 | Closeout assessment done, results posted, affirmation submitted. |
The DoD-format POA&M fields
This is a practical field set. 32 CFR 170.4 requires a POA&M to identify the tasks, the resources required, the milestones, and the scheduled completion dates. The rows below cover that and add what an assessor will ask for at closeout.
| Field | Purpose |
|---|---|
| Control ID | The CMMC requirement and its NIST SP 800-171 number (e.g. AU.L2-3.3.4 / 3.3.4). |
| Weakness / gap | Which NIST SP 800-171A assessment objectives are not currently met, and why. |
| Point value | Per the CMMC scoring methodology (32 CFR 170.24). Items above 1 point can't be on a CMMC POA&M, except SC.L2-3.13.11. |
| CMMC POA&M eligibility | Eligible / Not eligible, with the basis: 170.21(a)(2)(ii) (point value) or 170.21(a)(2)(iii) (prohibited). |
| Conditional CMMC Status Date and closeout deadline | The status date, and the status date + 180 days (170.21(b)). |
| Point of contact | The role responsible for closing the gap (a role, not a person's name). |
| Resources required | Tools, budget, headcount, or third-party services needed. |
| Scheduled completion date | Target close date, within 180 days of the Conditional CMMC Status Date. |
| Milestones | Intermediate checkpoints, dated relative to the status date. |
| Milestone changes | Audit trail of slippage. Assessors read this. |
| Evidence at closure | The artifact(s) that will prove each objective is now met. |
| Status | Open / In progress / Closed (verified at closeout). |
Why there's no "Risk-Accepted" status: the rule requires every NOT MET requirement on the POA&M to be remediated and closed out within 180 days (32 CFR 170.16(a)(1)(ii)(B); 170.21(b)). There is no risk-acceptance path to Final status. A condition that cannot be remediated is an enduring exception documented in the SSP. A temporary deficiency with a fix in progress goes in the operational plan of action (32 CFR 170.4).
Example POA&M template structure
A minimum-viable CMMC POA&M line for an eligible 1-point requirement looks like this. Dates are relative to the Conditional CMMC Status Date ("SD").
Control ID : AU.L2-3.3.4 (NIST SP 800-171 3.3.4)
Requirement : Alert in the event of an audit logging process failure.
Point value : 1 (32 CFR 170.24)
CMMC POA&M : Eligible (1 point; not on the 170.21(a)(2)(iii) list)
Weakness : Endpoints and servers forward logs to the central log
platform, but no alert fires when a forwarder stops
sending or the log store fills. Failures are found
only during manual review.
Objectives unmet : 3.3.4[a] personnel or roles to be alerted on an
audit logging process failure are not identified;
3.3.4[b] types of audit logging process failures
for which alerts are generated are not defined;
3.3.4[c] identified roles are not alerted when a
failure occurs
Owner (role) : Security Operations Lead
Resources : Log platform alerting rules, on-call distribution
list, 8 staff-hours
Status date (SD) : Date results posted to SPRS
Milestones : SD + 30 days define failure types and alert recipients
(update audit logging procedure)
SD + 60 days alert rules live for forwarder silence,
storage threshold, agent stop
SD + 90 days simulated forwarder outage; alert
received and ticketed
Scheduled close : SD + 90 days (deadline SD + 180 days)
Evidence at close : Alert rule export (dated after the change);
ticket from the simulated outage showing the alert
and the response; updated audit logging / monitoring
SOP with the defined failure types and recipients;
SSP section for 3.3.4 revised to match
Status : In progressTwo lines that show how the eligibility rules apply:
Control ID : PE.L2-3.10.5 (Manage physical access devices)
CMMC POA&M : NOT ELIGIBLE: prohibited by 32 CFR 170.21(a)(2)(iii),
even though it is a 1-point requirement.
Action : Must be MET before the assessment. Track the fix in
your operational plan of action, not the CMMC POA&M.
Control ID : SC.L2-3.13.11 (FIPS-validated cryptography for CUI)
CMMC POA&M : ELIGIBLE ONLY IF encryption is employed but the module
is not FIPS-validated (3-point deduction).
If no encryption is employed (5 points): NOT eligible.See the SC.L2-3.13.11 FIPS encryption evidence guide for what "employed but not validated" looks like in evidence.
Operational plan of action (3.12.2) vs the CMMC assessment POA&M
People mix these two artifacts up. They are different things with different rules.
| CMMC assessment POA&M | Operational plan of action | |
|---|---|---|
| What it lists | NOT MET requirements from an assessment | Temporary vulnerabilities and temporary deficiencies |
| Limits | 170.21 gates: ≥ 0.8 score, 1-point items only (3.13.11 exception), six prohibited | Defined by the OSA |
| Timeline | Closed within 180 days of the Conditional CMMC Status Date | "Does not identify a timeline for remediation" (170.4) |
| Scoring effect | Items stay NOT MET and keep their deduction | A temporary deficiency properly addressed here is assessed MET (170.24(b)(1)(ii)) |
32 CFR 170.4 defines a temporary deficiency as a condition where remediating a discovered deficiency is feasible and a known fix is available or in process. It must be documented in an operational plan of action. 170.24(b)(1)(ii) adds that the plan must show deficiency reviews and progress toward correction for the item to be assessed MET.
The NIST requirement behind this is CA.L2-3.12.2: "develop and implement plans of action designed to correct deficiencies and reduce or eliminate vulnerabilities" (NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, 3.12.2). Assessors examine that process even when your assessment POA&M is empty. CA.L2-3.12.2 is itself a 3-point requirement (170.24(c)(2)(i)(B)(2)). If your plan-of-action process is missing, that gap can't go on the POA&M either.
Evidence for the process: CA.L2-3.12.2 plan of action evidence guide.
How POA&M closeout gets tested (and where it fails)
The closeout assessment covers only the NOT MET requirements that were on the POA&M, but each one is assessed against all of its objectives. Expect the three assessment methods NIST SP 800-171A defines (§2.1):
- EXAMINE:
- the closed POA&M line and its milestone-change history
- the revised SSP section
- configuration exports or screenshots
- dated tickets and change records
- INTERVIEW: the owner role, on how the control now operates day to day, not just how it was fixed.
- TEST: a live demonstration. For AU.L2-3.3.4, stop a log forwarder and show the alert arrive.
Named artifacts to have ready:
- POA&M register (CSV), with status date and deadline on every line
- SSP revision history showing the affected sections updated
- Closeout self-assessment record (Level 2 Self)
- SPRS posting confirmation (170.16(a)(1)(ii)(B))
- Affirming Official affirmation (170.22(b)(2))
Failure patterns. This is practitioner guidance, not rule text:
- Closed on paper only. The item is marked closed, but the SSP still describes the old state.
- No evidence of operation. The fix landed, but nothing dated after the change shows it working.
- Day-179 closeout. There is no time to re-test when the closeout finds a gap.
- A prohibited item on the POA&M. One of the six went on the POA&M anyway, so the status was never Conditional in the first place.
- Death by 1-pointers. Enough eligible gaps pushed the score under 88.
- Wrong start date. The 180 days were counted from the assessment, not the Conditional CMMC Status Date.
Does the CMMC Phase 2 suspension change the POA&M rules?
No change to the rule text so far. On July 13, 2026, the Department of War suspended the November 2026 Phase 2 transition. During the suspension, DoD requirements may designate only CMMC Level 1 (Self) or Level 2 (Self).
The text of 32 CFR 170.21 is unchanged in the eCFR (current as of 15 October 2026). Its POA&M conditions still govern any Conditional Level 2 (Self) status.
Whether a given contract requires a CMMC status at all depends on the clause in that contract. DoD has directed contracting officers to remove Level 2 (C3PAO) and Level 3 (DIBCAC) requirements from active solicitations and, by modification, from existing contracts.
For the live picture, see CMMC status: what's in force today.
Start your POA&M
Check each item against the eligibility table above before it goes on your POA&M. A POA&M records a plan. It does not implement the control, and it isn't an assessment.
Prepared by the Athena Consulting Group CMMC practice. Athena is not a C3PAO and does not certify; this page explains the published rules so you can prepare.